short notes is a journal on software, systems, engineering practices among other things.
Copyright © 2002-2006 short notes. All rights reserved.    contact address: email to the editor   ISSN 1543-6489

short notes
 
Tuesday, 30. March 2004

Death marches to the waterfall


Lately the waterfall methodology has been roundly criticized for being too heavy-handed and expensive. Developing in the Internet time meant waterfall was past sell-by-date by many a lifecycle. Needless to say for certain kinds of software waterfall methodology may be useful: for example desiging and implementing languages and their backwards compatible successors. However for the most commercial software development waterfall has been an embarrassing failure. The rise of agile methodologies (the most famous among them XP) seems to confirm the waterfall's disfavor among the technorati at last.

Or does it? Despite lip services paid to faster, nimbler software engineering practices, the industry hasn't changed its habit. Anecdotal evidences still depict wide spread analysis paralysis, slipping deadlines, worsening regressions, uncontrollable mutations, sinking morales and "death marches."


 

 
Published since 2002-04-23
Updated: 2010-10-16
status
Youre not logged in ... Login
menu
September 2018
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30
October
recent
recent

RSS Feed

RSS integration

Made with Antville
powered by
Helma Object Publisher